Maybe A Rolled Up Newspaper On The Nose...?

I'm beginning to wonder if even passing a Constitutional Amendment will be sufficient to stop activist judges. I guess where there's an activist will, there's a way. D*%# the Constitution, full speed ahead!

The judge's reasoning was that the amendment dealt with two issues instead of just one: Gay marriage and civil unions. I suppose if it only dealt with gay marriage, the judge would still claim it was two issues: Gays and marriage. Anything to thwart the will of the people.